Barvosa, Edwina. (2015). Mapping public ambivalence in public engagement with science: implications for democratizing the governance of fracking technologies in the USA. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(4), 497-507. doi: 10.1007/s13412-015-0340-y

Beaudrie, Christian. (2010). Emerging Nanotechnologies and Life Cycle Regulation: An Investigation of Federal Regulatory Oversight from Nanomaterial Production to End of Life. Chemical Heritage Foundation, 1-63.

Beaudrie, Christian, & Kandlikar, Milind. (2011). Horses for Courses: Risk Information and Decision Making in the Regulation of Nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research Special Focus: Governance of Nanobiotechnology(DOI 10.1007/s11051-011-0234-1), 1-12.

Beaudrie, Christian, Kandlikar, Milind, & Ramachandran, Gurumurthy. (2011). Using Expert Judgment for Risk Assessment. In G. Ramachandran (Ed.), Assessing Nanoparticle Risks to Human Health (pp. 110-138). Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier.

Beaudrie, Christian, Kandlikar, Milind, & Satterfield, Terre. (2013). From Cradle-to-Grave at the Nanoscale: Gaps in US Regulatory Oversight along the Nanomaterial Life Cycle. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(11), 5524-5534. doi: 10.1021/es303591x

Beaudrie, Christian, Kandlikar, Milind, & Satterfield, Terre. (2013). "UBC SDM Risk Workshop summary CNS Report: Center for Nanotechnology in Society - UCSB.

Beaudrie, Christian, Satterfield, Terre, Kandlikar, Milind, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2013). Expert Views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies. PLOS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080250

Beaudrie, Christian E. H., Satterfield, Terre, Kandlikar, Milind, & Harthorn, Barbara H. (2014). Scientists versus Regulators: Precaution, Novelty & Regulatory Oversight as Predictors of Perceived Risks of Engineered Nanomaterials. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e106365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106365

Beaudrie, ChristianE H., Kandlikar, Milind, Gregory, Robin, Long, Graham, & Wilson, Tim. (2014). Nanomaterial risk screening: a structured approach to aid decision making under uncertainty. Environment Systems and Decisions, 1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10669-014-9529-y

Becker, Amy B., & Copeland, Lauren. (2016). Networked publics: How connective social media use facilitates political consumerism among LGBT Americans. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 22-36. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1131655

Becker, Sean. (2013). Nanotechnology in the marketplace: how the nanotechnology industry views risk. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(1426), 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1426-7

Bimber, Bruce, Brundidge, Jennifer, Conroy, Meredith, & Lively, Erica. (2013). Issue Comparisons and Ordinal Priming (Vol. 7). International Journal of Communication: USC Annenberg Press.

Charles, Maria, Harr, Bridget, Cech, Erin, & Hendley, Alexandra. (2014). Who likes math where? Gender differences in eighth-graders’ attitudes around the world. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(1), 85-112. doi: 10.1080/09620214.2014.895140

Cherry, Catherine, Hopfe, Christina, MacGillivray, Brian, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2013). Media discourses of low carbon housing: The marginalisation of social and behvioural dimensions within the British broadsheet press. Public Understanding of Science. doi: 10.1177/0963662513512442

Cleveland, David A., Copeland, Lauren, Glasgow, Garrett, McGinnis, Michael Vincent, & Smith, Eric R. A. N. (2016). The Influence of Environmentalism on Attitudes Toward Local Agriculture and Urban Expansion. Society & Natural Resources, 29(1), 88-103. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1043081

Conroy, Meredith. (2010). A Psychology of Framing: The Effects of Personality on Susceptibility to Media Frames. (Ph.D.), University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=02-19-2017&FMT=7&DID=2265984601&RQT=309&attempt=1&cfc=1 

Conti, Joseph, Killpack, Keith, Gerritzen, Gina, Huang, Leia, Mircheva, Maria, Delmas, Magali, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Appelbaum, Richard, & Holden, Patricia. (2008). Health and Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Workplace: Results From an International Survey. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(9), 3155-3262.

Conti, Joseph, Satterfield, Terre, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2011). Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions Risk Analysis 31(11), 1734–1748. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01608.x

Copeland, Lauren. (2013). Value Change and Political Action: Postmaterialism, Environmentalism, and Political Consumerism. American Politics Research. doi: 10.1177/153267X13494235

Copeland, Lauren. (2014). Conceptualizing Political Consumerism: How Citizenship Norms Differentiate Boycotting from Buycotting. Political Studies, 62, 172-186. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12067

Copeland, Lauren, & Atkinson, L. (forthcoming). Political and Ethical Considerations in the Evolution of Consumer Activism as a Form of Political Participation and Civic Engagement. . In T. Newholm, M. Chatzidakis, M. Carrington & D. Shaw (Eds.), Ethics and Morality in Consumption: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Routledge.

Copeland, Lauren, & Atkinson, L. (2016). Political Consumption: Ethics, Participation and Civic Engagement. In M. Chatzidakis, M. Carrington & D. Shaw (Eds.), Ethics and Morality in Consumption: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Routledge.

Copeland, Lauren, & Hasell, Ariel. (2014). Framing Effects on People’s Expressed Willingness to Purchase Nanotechnology Applications in the U.S. In C. Coenen, A. Dijkstra, C. Fautz, J. Guivant, K. Konrad, C. Milburn & H. van Lente (Eds.), Innovation and Responsibility: Engaging With New and Emerging Technologies (Vol. 5, pp. 87-106). Berlin: IOS Press.

Copeland, Lauren, & Smith, Eric. R.A.N. (forthcoming). Political Consumerism: Citizen Activism in Response to Climate Change and other Environmental Problems. In Y. Wolinsky-Nahmias (Ed.), Climate Change Policy and the Role of Society. Washington, D.C: CQ Press.

Corner, Adam. (2013). Geoengineering & Green Thought.  Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2013/jul/29/messing-nature-geoengineering-green-thought

Corner, Adam, Markowitz, Ezra, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2014). Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(3), 411-422. doi: 10.1002/wcc.269

Corner, Adam, Parkhill, Karen, & Vaughan, Naomi. (2013). Messing with Nature: Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 938-947. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002

Corner, Adam, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2010). Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment, 52(1), 24-37.

Corner, Adam, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2012). Nanotechnologies and Upstream Public Engagement: Dilemmas, Debates and Prospects? In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 247-283). New York: Routledge.

Corner, Adam, Pidgeon, Nick, & Parkhill, Karen. (2012). Perceptions of geoengineering: Public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives & the challenge of ‘upstream’ engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (WIRES) Climate Change. doi: 10.1002/wcc.176

Demski, Christina, Butler, Catherine, Parkhill, Karen A., Spence, Alexa, & Pidgeon, Nick F. (2015). Public values for energy system change. Global Environmental Change, 34, 59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.014

Engeman, Cassandra. (2014). Social movement unionism in practice: organizational dimensions of union mobilization in the Los Angeles immigrant rights marches. Work, Employment & Society. doi: 10.1177/0950017014552027

Engeman, Cassandra, Baumgartner, Lynn, Carr, Benjamin, Fish, Allison, Meyerhofer, John, Satterfield, Terre, Holden, Patricia, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2012). Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14(749), 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-0749-0

Engeman, Cassandra, Baumgartner, Lynn, Carr, Benjamin, Fish, Allison, Meyerhofer, John, Satterfield, Terre, Holden, Patricia, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2013). The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene., 10(9), 487-495. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818231

Fadel, Tarek, Morita, Shelah, & Mayfield, Michael. (2013). Stakeholder Perspectives on Perception, Assessment, and Management of the Potential Risks of Nanotechnology. In M. Panter, P. Johnson & G. Holdridge (Eds.), (pp. 74). Arlington: National nanotechnology Coordination Office.

Freudenburg, William, & Collins, Mary. (2012). Public Responses to Nanotechnology: Risks to the Social Fabric? In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 241-264). New York: Routledge.

Friedman, Sharon, & Egolf, Brenda. (2011). A Longitudinal Study of Newspaper and Wire Service Coverage of Nanotechnology Risks. Risk Analysis, 31(11), 1701-1717.

Friedman, Sharon, & Egolf, Brenda. (2012). Perspective: What have the Mass Media been Reporting on Nanotechnology Risks? In S. H. Priest (Ed.), Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication (pp. 157-165). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Friedman, Sharon, & Egolf, Brenda. (2015). Nanotechnology Health Risks: Is The Public Getting the Whole Story? JSM Nanotechnology & Nanomedicine, 2(2).

Godwin, H. A., Chopra, K., Bradley, K. A., Cohen, Y., Harthorn, B. H., Hoek, E. M., Holden, P., Keller, A. A., Lenihan, H. S., Nisbet, R. M., & Nel, A. E. (2009). The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environ Sci Technol, 43(17), 6453-6457.

Gregory, Robin, Satterfield, Terre, & Hasell, Ariel. (2016). Using decision pathway surveys to inform climate engineering policy choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 560-565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508896113

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2006). Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies Anthropology News (Vol. 47, pp. 26): John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2009). Reflections from Dr. Barbara Herr Harthorn A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (pp. pg 43).

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2010). Public participation in nanotechnology – should we care? 2020 Science

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2010). Gender and Nanotechnology. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 269-271). London: Sage.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2010). Amplification of Risk. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 669-670). London: Sage.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2010). Attenuation of Risk. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 671-672). London: Sage.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2011). Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (forthcoming). Societal Science for Converging and Emerging Technologies. In W. Bainbridge & M. C. Roco (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence: Springer.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (forthcoming). Envisioning Our Nano-Medical Futures: Techno-Benefits and Social Risks? In L. Manderson, E. Cartwright & A. Hardon (Eds.), Vital Signs: Medical Anthropology for the 21st Century. London: Routledge.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (forthcoing). Nanotechnology. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Social Theory: Wiley-Blackwell.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (forthcoming). Techno-benefits and social risks. In L. Manderson, A. Hardon & E. Cartwright (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Medical Anthropology (Vol. The Routledge Handbook of Medical Anthropology). London: Routledge.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2016). Unifying ethical concepts. In W. Bainbridge, W. Sims & M. Roco (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence, ch. 54. Switzerland: Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Bryant, Karl, & Rogers, Jennifer. (2009). Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. Paper presented at the University of Washington Center for Workforce Development, Seattle, WA. http://depts.washington.edu/ntethics/symposium/index.shtml

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, McCray, W. Patrick, & Satterfield, Terre. (2006). Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology, 28(2), 38-40.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Mohr, John. (2012). Introduction: The Social Scientific View of Nanotechnologies. In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 1-15). New York: Routledge.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Mohr, John W. (Eds.). (2012). The Social Life of Nanotechnology. New York: Routledge.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Pidgeon, Nick, & Satterfield, Terre. (2009). Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology AZoM.com: AZoM.com

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Rogers, Jennifer, & Shearer, Christine. (2010). Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Paper presented at the Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting, Santa Barbara, CA.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Rogers, Jennifer, Shearer, Christine, & Martin, Tyronne. (2012). Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment. In D. Scott & B. Francis (Eds.), Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good (2nd ed., pp. 227-249). New York: Prometheus Books.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Shearer, Christine, & Rogers, Jennifer. (2011). Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. In T. Zuelsdorf (Ed.), Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies (pp. 75-89). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Shearer, Christine, & Rogers, Jennifer. (2012). Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. In R. Parker & R. Appelbaum (Eds.), Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development? (pp. 188-197). New York: Routledge.

Jae-Young, Choi, Ramachandra, Gurumurthy, & Kandlikar, Milind. (2009). The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environmental Science and Technology, 43(9), 3030-3034.

Johansson, Mikael. (2009). Next to nothing: A Study of Scientists and their Cosmology at a Swedish Research Laboratory. Sweden: Gothenburg University.

Johansson, Mikael. (2010). Nano Culture. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 462-463). London: Sage Publications.

Johansson, Mikael. (2011). Technological Utopia. Technology, Green Series, 10.

Johansson, Mikael. (2012). Working for Next to Nothing - Labor in the Global Nanoscientific Community. In B. H. Harthorn & J. W. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 88-110). New York: Routledge.

Kandlikar, Milind, Jani, C, & Dowlatabadi, H. (2015). Emerging Technologies and Life Cycle Management: Closing the Loop on Lithium Ion Batteries Used in Electric Vehicles.

Kandlikar, Milind, Ramachandran, Gurumurthy, Maynard, Andrew, Murdock, Barbara, & Toscano, William. (2007). Health Risk Assessment for Nanoparticles: A Case for Using Expert Judgment. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9(1), 137-156.

Lively, Erica, Conroy, Meredith, Weaver, David, & Bimber, Bruce. (2012). News Media Frame Novel Technologies in a Familiar Way: Nanotechnology, Applications, and Progress. In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 223-240). New York: Routledge.

Maldonado, Julie, Shearer, Christine, & Bronen, Robin. (forthcoming). Climate Change, Displacement and Tribal Communities: Road Map for Adaptation Policies. Climactic Change.

McCarty, Philip, Lively, Erica, Weaver, David, Mohr, John, & Bimber, Bruce. (2008). The Role of Governmental and Non-Governmental Institutions in Framing Nanotechnology as a Social Issue. Santa Barbara, CA.

Motoyama, Yasuyuki, Appelbaum, Richard P., & Parker, Rachel. (2011). The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal Support for Science and Technology, or Hidden Industrial Policy? Technology in Society, 33(1-2), 109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.010

Motoyama, Yasuyuki, Cao, Cong, & Appelbaum, Richard. (2014). Observing regional divergence of Chinese nanotechnology centers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81(0), 11-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.013

Motoyama, Yasuyuki, & Eisler, Matthew N. (2011). Bibliometry and Nanotechnology: A Meta-Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1174-1182. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.013

Neuman, Daniel, Ostrowski, Alexis D., Absalonson, Ryan O., Strouse, Geoffrey F., & Ford, Peter C. (2007). Photosensitized NO Release from Water-Soluble Nanoparticle Assemblies

Journal of the American Chemical Society, 129(14), 2.

Neuman, Daniel, Ostrowski, Alexis D., Mikhailovsky, Alexander A., Absalonson, Ryan O., Strouse, Geoffrey F., & Ford, Peter C. (2008). Quantum Dot Fluorescence Quenching Pathways with Cr(III) Complexes. Photosensitized NO Production from trans-Cr(cyclam)(ONO)2+. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 130, 168-175.

Ostrowski, Alexis D., Martin, Tyronne, Conti, Joseph A., Hurt, Indy, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2009). Nanotoxicology: Characterizing the Scientific Literature: 2000-2007. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11, 251-257.

Parkhill, Karen, Demski, Christina, Butler, Catherine, Spence, Alexa, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2013). Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability: Synthesis Report (pp. 1-48). UKERC: London.

Parkhill, Karen, Pidgeon, Nick, Corner, Adam, & Vaughan, Naomi. (2013). Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. In R. Owen, J. Bessant & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation (pp. 219-240). London: Wiley.

Partridge, Tristan. (2015). The Páramo, Where Water is Born. Farming Matters, 31, 8-9.

Partridge, Tristan. (2015). Recoupling Groups Who Resist: Dimensions of Difference, Opposition and Affirmation. Journal of Resistance Studies, 1(2), 12-50.

Partridge, Tristan. (2016). Unconventional Action and Community Control: Rerouting Dependencies Despite the Hydrocarbon Economy ExtrACTION: Impacts, Engagements and Alternative Futures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

Partridge, Tristan. (2015). The Páramo, Where Water is Born. Farming Matters, 31, 8-9.

Partridge, Tristan. (2015). Recoupling Groups Who Resist: Dimensions of Difference, Opposition and Affirmation. Journal of Resistance Studies, 1(2), 12-50.

Partridge, Tristan. (forthcoming). Rural intersections: Resource marginalisation and the “non-Indian problem” in highland Ecuador. Journal of Rural Studies. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.001

Partridge, Tristan, Harthorn, Barbara, Thomas, Merryn, Pidgeon, Nick, Hasell, Ariel, Stevenson, Louise, & Enders, Catherine. (Under Review). Emergent US and UK views on shale development, climate change and energy futures. Global Environmental Change.

Pidgeon, N. (2006). Opportunities and Uncertainties: The British Nanotechnologies Report and the Case for Upstream Societal Dialogue. In K. Andersson (Ed.), Valdor 2006: values in decisions on risk: proceedings (pp. 371-378). Stockholm: Congrex Sweden.

Pidgeon, N. (2006). Risk and uncertainty Trust in science: The Dialogue With Society (pp. 40-45). Berlin: Ernst Schering Foundation and the British Council.

Pidgeon, Nick. (2008). Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. In G. Bammer & M. Smithson (Eds.), Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 349-361). London: Earthscan

Pidgeon, Nick. (2009). Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (pp. 32).

Pidgeon, Nick. (2012). Opinion: Shale gas and public acceptability. Ingenia(52), 10-11.

Pidgeon, Nick , Corner, Adam, Parkhill, Karen, Spence, Alexa, Butler, Catherine, & Poortinga, Wouter. (2012). Exploring early responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (A), 307(1974), 4176-4196.

Pidgeon, Nick, Demski, Christina, Butler, Catherine, Parkhill, Karen, & Spence, Alexa. (2014). Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(Suppl 4), 13606-13613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317512111

Pidgeon, Nick , & Fischhoff, Baruch. (2011). The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change, 1(1). doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1080

Pidgeon, Nick, Harthorn, Barbara, & Satterfield, Terre (forthcoming). Cross-National Comparative Communication about the Risks of Nanotechnologies. In K. H. Jamieson, D. Scheufele & D. Kahan (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on the Science of Science Communication: Oxford University Press.

Pidgeon, Nick, Harthorn, Barbara, Satterfield, Terre , & Demski, Christina. (forthcoming). Cross-National Comparative Communication and Deliberation about the Risks of Nanotechnologies. In K. H. Jamieson, D. Scheufele & D. Kahan (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Science Communication: Oxford University Press.

Pidgeon, Nick, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Bryant, Karl, & Rogers-Hayden, Tee. (2009). Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(2), 95-98. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.362

Pidgeon, Nick, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Satterfield, Terre. (2010). Nanotech: Good or Bad? The Chemical Engineer, 37-39.

Pidgeon, Nick, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Satterfield, Terre. (2011). Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue), 31(11), 1694–1700. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x

Pidgeon, Nick, Parkhill, Karen, Corner, Adam, & Vaughan, Naomi. (2013). Deliberating Stratospheric Aerosols for Climate Geoengineering and the SPICE Project. Nature Climate Change, 3(5), 451-457. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1807

Pidgeon, Nick, & Rogers-Hayden, Tee. (2007). Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’? Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue, 9(2), 191-210. doi: 10.1080/13698570701306906

Pidgeon, Nick, Satterfield, Terre, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2011). Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis, 31(11), 1649-1783. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x

Pidgeon, Nick, Thomas, Merryn, Partridge, Tristan, Evensen, Darrick, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Kasperson, Roger. (in press). Hydraulic Fracturing - A Risk for Environment, Energy Security and Affordability? In Risk Conundrums: Solving Unsolvable Problems: Kasperson Roger, Ed.

Powers, Christina M, Grieger, Khar aD, Beaudrie, Christian, Hendren, ChristineOgilvie, Michael Davis, J., Wang, Amy, Sayes, ChristieM, MacDonell, Margaret, & Gift, JeffreyS. (2015). Data dialogues: critical connections for designing and implementing future nanomaterial research. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(1), 76-87. doi: 10.1007/s10669-014-9518-1

Putnam, L., Kisselburgh, L. G., Berkelaar, B. L., Buzzanell, P. M., Mastronardi, M., Jackson, M., Stoltzfus, K., Jorgenson, J., & Wang, J. (2009). 21st century STEM careers: Communication perspectives and research opportunities. In L. Harter & M. J. Dutta (Eds.), Engaging communication theory, research and pedagogy to communicate for social impact. New York: Hampton Press.

Rayner, Steve, Clare, Heyward, Kruger, Tim, Pidgeon, Nick, Redgwell, Catherine, & Savulescu, Julian. (2013). The Oxford Principles. Climactic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2

Roco, Mihail, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Guston, David, & Shapira, Philip. (2011). Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. In M. Roco & M. C. Hersam (Eds.), Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020 (pp. 561-618). New York: Springer.

Roco, Mihail, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Guston, David, & Shapira, Philip. (2011). Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13(9), 3557-3590. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4

Rogers, Jennifer. (2010). Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 261-262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rogers, Jennifer. (2010). iPod Nano. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 363-365). London: Sage.

Rogers, Jennifer. (2010). Center for Nanotechnology in Society-UC Santa Barbara. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 80-82). London: Sage.

Rogers, Jennifer, & Zader, Amy. (2012). Food Security: From the Green Revolution to Nanotechnology. In R. Parker & R. Appelbaum (Eds.), Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development? (pp. 75-85). New York: Routledge.

Rogers-Brown, Jennifer, Shearer, Christine, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2011). From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 2(1), 149-169. doi: 10.3167/ares.2011.020109

Rogers-Brown, Jennifer, Shearer, Christine, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Martin, Tyronne. (2012). Different Uses, Different Responses: Exploring Emergent Cultural Values through Public Deliberation. In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 195-222). New York: Routledge.

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, Mohr, Alison, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2007). Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently? Nanoethics, Special Issue, 1(2), 123-176.

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2006). Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2(3), 167-178.

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, & Pidgeon, Nick (2008). Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs(June), 11.

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2008). Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: ‘upstream’ towards sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 1010-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.04.013

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2008). Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 345–364.

Satterfield, Terre, Conti, Joe, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Pidgeon, Nick, & Pitts, Anton. (2013). Understanding shifting perceptions of nanotechnologies and their implications for policy dialogues about emerging technologies. Science and Public Policy, 40(2), 247-260. doi: 10.1093/scippol/scs084

Satterfield, Terre, Kandlikar, Milind, Beaudrie, Christian, Conti, Joseph , & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2009). Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies: Will They Be Like Other Controversial Nanotechnologies. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 752-758.

Shearer, Christine. (2012). The Political Ecology of Adaptation Assistance: Alaska Natives, Displacement, and Relocation. The Journal of Political Ecology, 19, 174-183.

Shearer, Christine. (2012). From Kivalina A Climate change story. In S. Bannerjee (Ed.), Arctic Voices: Resistance at the Tipping Point (pp. 207-220). New York: Seven Stories Press.

Shearer, Christine. (2012). The Social Construction of Alaska native Vulnerability to Climate Change. Race, Gender, and Class, 19(1-2), 61-79.

Shearer, Christine. (2012). Book Reviews: Kari Marie Norgaard's Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. Race, Gender, and Class, 19(1-2).

Shearer, Christine, Rogers-Brown, Jennifer, Bryant, Karl, Cranfill, Rachel, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2014). Power and Vulnerability: Re-contextualizing 'low risk' views of environmental and health hazards. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy.

Simakova, Elena. (2012). Making nano matter: An inquiry into the discourses of governable science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 37(6), 604-626.Thomas, Merryn, Partridge, Tristan, Pidgeon, Nick, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (under review ). Deliberating upstream shale gas and oil extraction by hydraulic fracturing in the US and UK. Nature Energy.

Thomas, Merryn, Pidgeon, Nick, Evensen, Darrick, Partridge, Tristan, Hasell, Ariel, Enders, Catherine, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2015). Public Perceptions of Shale Gas Operations in the USA and Canada: A Review of Evidence M4ShaleGas: Measuring, monitoring, mitigating and managing the environmental impact of shale gas. Netherlands: TNO-Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research: The European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme.

Thomas, Merryn, Pidgeon, Nick, Whitmarsh, Lorraine, & Ballinger, Rhoda. (2015). Mental models of sea-level change: A mixed methods analysis on the Severn Estuary, UK. Global Environmental Change, 33, 71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.009

Thomas, Merryn, Pidgeon, Nick, Whitmarsh, Lorraine, & Ballinger, Rhoda. (2015). Mental models of sea-level change: A mixed methods analysis on the Severn Estuary, UK. Global Environmental Change, 33, 71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.009

Thomas, Merryn, Pidgeon, Nick, Whitmarsh, Lorraine, & Ballinger, Rhoda. (2015). Expert judgements of sea-level rise at the local scale. Journal of Risk Research, 1-22. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1043568

Weaver, David A., & Bimber, Bimber. (2008). Finding news stories: A comparison of searches using LexisNexis and Google News. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(3), 515-530.

Weaver, David A., Lively, Erica, & Bimber, Bruce. (2009). Searching for a Frame: Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation in the Case of Nanotechnology. Science Communication, 31(2), 139-166.

Xia, Tian, Malasarn, Davin, Lin, Sijie, Ji, Zhaoxia, Zhang, Haiyuan, Miller, Robert J., Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Godwin, Hilary A., Lenihan, Hunter S., Liu, Rong, Gardea-Torresdey, Jorge, Cohen, Yoram, Mädler, Lutz, Holden, Patricia A., Zink, Jeffrey I., & Nel, Andre E. (2012). Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Solve Complex Nano EHS problems by the UC Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Small. doi: 10.1002/smll.201201700