Appelbaum, Richard, & Parker, Rachel (2008). China's Bid to be the Global Nanotech Leader: Advancing Nanotechnology Through State-Led Programs and International Collaborations. Science and Public Policy, 35(5), 319-334.

Appelbaum, Richard. (2010). Nanotechnology. In H. K. Anheier & M. Juergensmeyer (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Global Studies, 1205-1208. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Appelbaum, Richard. (2011). Will China Eat Our Lunch?  Review of Denis Fred Simon and Cong Cao, China’s Emerging Technological Edge. Asia Policy (11), 160-164.

Appelbaum, Richard, Parker, Rachel, & Cao, Cong. (2011). Developmental state and innovation: Nanotechnology in China. Global Networks, 11(3), 298–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2011.00327.x

Appelbaum, Richard, Parker, Rachel, Cao, Cong, & Gereffi, Gary. (2011). China's (Not So Hidden) Developmental State: Becoming a Leading Nanotechnology Innovator in the Twenty-first Century. In F. Block & M. R. Keller (Eds.), State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development (pp. 217-235). Boulder, CO Paradigm Press.

Appelbaum, Richard, & Parker, Rachel. (2012). China’s Move to High Tech Innovation. In C. Dent & J. Dosch (Eds.), The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism And The Global System (pp. 201-215). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Appelbaum, Richard, Cao, Cong, Parker, Rachel, & Motoyama, Yasuyuki. (2012). Nanotechnology as Industrial Policy: China and the United States. In B. H. Harthorn & J. W. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 111-133). New York: Routledge.

Appelbaum, Richard. (2013). Innovative and Responsible Governance of Converging Technologies. In M. Roco (Ed.), Innovative and Responsible Governance of Converging Technologies. OECD Workshop Report on Bridging the Divide Between Policy, Practice and Research on Public Engagement on Nanotechnologies.

Appelbaum, Richard. (2014). China: Innovator or Follower. China Policy Institute Blog. from http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/chinapolicyinstitute/2014/12/05/china-innovator-or-follower/

Appelbaum, Richard, Gebbie, Matt, Han, Shirley, & Stocking, Galen. (2016). Will China's Quest for Indigenous Innovation Succeed? Some Lessons From Nanotechnology. Technology in Society 46 (August), 149-163.

Appelbaum, Richard, Zayago Lau, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, Parker, Rachel, Vazquez, Laura Liliana Villa, Belmont, Eduardo Robles, & Figueroa, Edgar Ramón Arteaga. (2016). Inventory of nanotechnology companies in Mexico. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(2): 42-53. doi: 10.1007/s11051-016-3344-y

Arteaga Figueroa, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, Záyago Lau, Edgar, & Robles Belmont, E. (2014). Las nanotecnologías aplicadas al sector energético. Observatorio del Desarrollo, 3(11), 35-40. http://estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/observatorio/ob12/10.pdf

Arteaga Figueroa, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, Robles Belmont, E, Záyago Lau, Edgar, Appelbaum, Richard, & Parker, Rachel. (forthcoming). Patentes e innovación de nanotecnología en México. Revista Investigación Y Ciencia UAA.

Barnett, Gerald. (2011). Recombinant Innovation. Review of Genentech: The Beginnings of Biotech by Sally Smith. Science 334 (6062), 1497-1497. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6062/1497.full?sid=9000960a-fa25-494c-9b1a-301e48948be6 doi:10.1126/science.1215785

Barvosa, Edwina. (2015). Mapping public ambivalence in public engagement with science: implications for democratizing the governance of fracking technologies in the USA. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(4), 497-507. doi: 10.1007/s13412-015-0340-y

Beaudrie, Christian. (2010). Emerging Nanotechnologies and Life Cycle Regulation: An Investigation of Federal Regulatory Oversight from Nanomaterial Production to End of Life. Chemical Heritage Foundation, 1-63.

Beaudrie, Christian, & Kandlikar, Milind. (2011). Horses for Courses: Risk Information and Decision Making in the Regulation of Nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research Special Focus: Governance of Nanobiotechnology 13(4), 1477-1488. (DOI 10.1007/s11051-011-0234-1), 1-12.

Beaudrie, Christian, Kandlikar, Milind, & Ramachandran, Gurumurthy. (2011). Using Expert Judgment for Risk Assessment. In G. Ramachandran (Ed.), Assessing Nanoparticle Risks to Human Health (pp. 110-138). Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier.

Beaudrie, Christian, Kandlikar, Milind, & Satterfield, Terre. (2013). From Cradle-to-Grave at the Nanoscale: Gaps in US Regulatory Oversight along the Nanomaterial Life Cycle. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(11), 5524-5534. doi: 10.1021/es303591x

Beaudrie, Christian, Kandlikar, Milind, & Satterfield, Terre. (2013). "UBC SDM Risk Workshop summary.” CNS Report: Center for Nanotechnology in Society - UCSB.

Beaudrie, Christian, Satterfield, Terre, Kandlikar, Milind, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2013). Expert Views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies. PLOS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080250

Beaudrie, Christian, Kandlikar, Milind, Gregory, Robin, Long, Graham, & Wilson, Tim. (2014). Nanomaterial risk screening: a structured approach to aid decision making under uncertainty. Environment Systems and Decisions 35(1), 88-109. doi: 10.1007/s10669-014-9529-y

Beaudrie, Christian, Satterfield, Terre, Kandlikar, Milind, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2014). Scientists versus Regulators: Precaution, Novelty & Regulatory Oversight as Predictors of Perceived Risks of Engineered Nanomaterials. PLoS One, 9(9), e106365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106365

Becker, Amy B., & Copeland, Lauren. (2016). Networked publics: How connective social media use facilitates political consumerism among LGBT Americans. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 22-36. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1131655

Becker, Sean. (2013). Nanotechnology in the marketplace: how the nanotechnology industry views risk. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(1426), 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1426-7

Bimber, Bruce, & Copeland, Lauren. (2013). Digital Media and Traditional Political Participation Over Time in the U.S. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(2), 125-137. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2013.769925

Bimber, Bruce, Brundidge, Jennifer, Conroy, Meredith, & Lively, Erica. (2013). Issue Comparisons and Ordinal Priming (Vol. 7). International Journal of Communication: USC Annenberg Press.

Bimber, Bruce, Cunill, Martha C., Copeland, Lauren, & Gibson, Rachel. (2014). Digital Media and Political Participation: The Moderating Role of Political Interest Across Acts and Over Time. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 21-42. doi: 10.1177/0894439314526559

Brock, David. (2011). The Uncertain Future of Moore’s Law - The Rise of 3-D Transistors and What it Means for Technology in the 21st Century. Science Progress, 1-5.

Brock, David. (2013). “James Von Her.” Oral History Interview.

Brock, David. (2013). “Nadrian Seeman.” Oral History Interview.

Brock, David. (2013). “Thomas Everhart.” Oral History Interview.

Brock, David. (forthcoming). Alternate Materialities of Microcircuitry. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

Cao, Cong, Suttmeier, Richard, & Simon, Denis Fred. (2009). Success in State Directed Innovation? Perspectives on China's Plan for the Development of Science and Technology. In G. Parayil & A. P. D. Costa (Eds.), The New Asian Innovation Dynamics: China and India in Perspective, 247-264. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cao, Cong, Appelbaum, Richard, & Parker, Rachel. (2013). Research is High and the Market is Far Away - Commercialization of Nanotechnology in China. Technology in Society, 35, 55-64.

Charles, Maria, Harr, Bridget, Cech, Erin, & Hendley, Alexandra. (2014). Who likes math where? Gender differences in eighth-graders’ attitudes around the world. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(1), 85-112. doi: 10.1080/09620214.2014.895140

Cherry, Catherine, Hopfe, Christina, MacGillivray, Brian, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2013). Media discourses of low carbon housing: The marginalisation of social and behvioural dimensions within the British broadsheet press. Public Understanding of Science. doi: 10.1177/0963662513512442

Choi, Hyungsub. (2008). Maddin, Robert Oral History Interview. Philadelphia, PA: Chemical Heritage Foundation.

Choi, Hyungsub. (2008). Setting an Agenda for the Social Studies of Nanotechnology [white paper] Symposium on the Social Studies of Nanotechnology. Wharton School.

Choi, Hyungsub, & Mody, Cyrus. (2009). The Long History of Molecular Electronics: Microelectronics Origins of Nanotechnology. Social Studies of Science, 39(1), 11-50.

Choi, Hyungsub, & Otani, Takushi. (2012). Failure to Launch: Tarui Yasuo, the Quadrupole Transistor, and the Meanings of the IC in Postwar Japan. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 34(1), 48-59. doi: 10.1109/MAHC.2011.86

Choi, Hyungsub, & Shields, Brittany. (2015). A Place for Materials Science: Laboratory Buildings and Interdisciplinary Research at the University of Pennsylvania. Minerva, 53(1), 21-42. doi: 10.1007/s11024-015-9265-6

Choi, Hyungsub. (2015). Emerging opportunities: nanoelectronics and engineering research in a South Korean university. History and Technology, 1-20. doi: 10.1080/07341512.2015.1008961

Cleveland, David A., Copeland, Lauren, Glasgow, Garrett, McGinnis, Michael Vincent, & Smith, Eric R. A. N. (2016). The Influence of Environmentalism on Attitudes Toward Local Agriculture and Urban Expansion. Society & Natural Resources, 29(1), 88-103. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1043081

Collins, Mary B. (2011). “Risk-Based Targeting: Identifying Disproportionalities In The Sources And Effects Of Industrial Pollution.” American Journal of Public Health, 101(S1), S231-237.

Collins, Mary, & Freudenburg, William. (2013). Temporal Mypoia: A Case of Promising New Technologies, the Federal Government, and Inherent Conflicts of Interest. In S. Maret (Ed., special issue) William R. Freudenburg, A Life in Social Research (Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, Volume 21) (pp.259 – 276).

Collins, Mary, B., Munoz, Ian, & Jaja, Joseph. (2016). Linking ‘toxic outliers’ to environmental justice communities. Environmental Research Letters, 11(1), 1-9.

Collins, Mary. (forthcoming). Double Disproportionality: a Framework for Integrating Environmental Privileges and Problems. Social Science Quarterly.

Conroy, Meredith. (2010). A Psychology of Framing: The Effects of Personality on Susceptibility to Media Frames. (Ph.D.), University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=02-19-2017&FMT=7&DID=226598460...

Conti, Joseph, Killpack, Keith, Gerritzen, Gina, Huang, Leia, Mircheva, Maria, Delmas, Magali, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Appelbaum, Richard, & Holden, Patricia. (2008). Health and Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Workplace: Results From an International Survey. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(9), 3155-3262.

Conti, Joseph, Satterfield, Terre, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2011). Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions Risk Analysis 31(11), 1734–1748. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01608.x

Copeland, Lauren. (2013). Value Change and Political Action: Postmaterialism, Environmentalism, and Political Consumerism. American Politics Research 42(2), 257-282. doi: 10.1177/153267X13494235

Copeland, Lauren. (2014). Conceptualizing Political Consumerism: How Citizenship Norms Differentiate Boycotting from Buycotting. Political Studies, 62, 172-186. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12067

Copeland, Lauren, & Hasell, Ariel. (2014). Framing Effects on People’s Expressed Willingness to Purchase Nanotechnology Applications in the U.S. In C. Coenen, A. Dijkstra, C. Fautz, J. Guivant, K. Konrad, C. Milburn & H. van Lente (Eds.), Innovation and Responsibility: Engaging With New and Emerging Technologies (Vol. 5, pp. 87-106). Berlin: IOS Press.

Copeland, Lauren, & Römmele, Andrea. (2014). Beyond the Base? Political Parties, Citizen Activists, and Digital Media Use in the 2009 German Federal Election Campaign. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 169-185. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.902783

Copeland, Lauren, & Smith, Eric RAN. (2014). Consumer Political Action on Climate Change. In Y. Wolinsky-Nahmias (Ed.), Changing Climate Politics: US Policies and Civic Action (pp. 197-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.

Copeland, Lauren, & Bimber, Bruce. (2015). Variation in the Relationship Between Digital Media Use and Political Participation in U.S. Elections Over Time, 1996–2012: Does Obama’s Reelection Change the Picture? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(1), 74-87. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.975391

Copeland, Lauren, & Atkinson, Lucy. (2016). Political Consumption: Ethics, Participation and Civic Engagement. In M. Chatzidakis, M. Carrington & D. Shaw (Eds.), Ethics and Morality in Consumption: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 171-188. New York: Routledge.

Copeland, Lauren, & Smith, Eric. R.A.N. (forthcoming). Political Consumerism: Citizen Activism in Response to Climate Change and other Environmental Problems. In Y. Wolinsky-Nahmias (Ed.), Climate Change Policy and the Role of Society. Washington, D.C: CQ Press.

Corner, Adam, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2010). Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment, 52(1), 24-37.

Corner, Adam, Pidgeon, Nick, & Parkhill, Karen. (2012). Perceptions of geoengineering: Public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives & the challenge of ‘upstream’ engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (WIRES) Climate Change. doi: 10.1002/wcc.176

Corner, Adam, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2012). Nanotechnologies and Upstream Public Engagement: Dilemmas, Debates and Prospects? In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 247-283). New York: Routledge.

Corner, Adam, Parkhill, Karen, & Vaughan, Naomi. (2013). Messing with Nature: Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 938-947. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002

Corner, Adam. (2013). Geoengineering & Green Thought.  Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2013/jul/29/messing...

Corner, Adam, Markowitz, Ezra, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2014). Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(3), 411-422. doi: 10.1002/wcc.269

Demski, Christina, Butler, Catherine, Parkhill, Karen A., Spence, Alexa, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2015). Public values for energy system change. Global Environmental Change, 34, 59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.014

Dillemuth, Julie, Frederick, Stacey, Parker, Rachel, Gereffi, Gerry, & Appelbaum, Richard. (2011). Traveling Technologies: Societal Implications of Nanotechnology through the Global Value Chain. Journal of Nano Education, 3(1-2), 36-44.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2010). Department of Energy (DOE). In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 153-154). London: Sage.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2010). Nanotechnology in Manufacturing. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 548-551). London: Sage.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2010). Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 610-612). London: Sage.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2010). Science Policy. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 702-704). London: Sage.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2010). Self-Assembly. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 709-710). London: Sage.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2010). Spintronics. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 735-736). London: Sage.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2011). Energy Innovation at Nanoscale: Case Study of an Emergent Industry. Science Progress, 1-6.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2012). Perspective: Where Nano Came From. In S. H. Priest (Ed.), Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication (pp. 9-32). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2012). Science that Pays for Itself: Nanotechnology and the Discourse of Science Policy Reform. In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 19-36). New York: Routledge.

Eisler, Matthew. (2012). Overpotential: Fuel Cells, Futurism, and the Making of a Power Panacea Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Eisler, Matthew N. (2013). "The Ennobling Unity of Science and Technology: Materials Sciences and Engineering, the Department of Energy, and the Nanotechnology Enigma.” Minerva, 51(2), 225-251. doi: 10.1007/s11024-013-9224-z

Engeman, Cassandra, Baumgartner, Lynn, Carr, Benjamin, Fish, Allison, Meyerhofer, John, Satterfield, Terre, Holden, Patricia, & *Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2012). Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14(749), 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-0749-0

Engeman, Cassandra, Baumgartner, Lynn, Carr, Benjamin, Fish, Allison, Meyerhofer, John, Satterfield, Terre, Holden, Patricia, & *Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2013). The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 10(9), 487-495. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818231

Engeman, Cassandra. (2014). Social movement unionism in practice: organizational dimensions of union mobilization in the Los Angeles immigrant rights marches. Work, Employment & Society. doi: 10.1177/0950017014552027

Engeman, Cassandra. (2015). Family and Medical Leave in the U.S.: Incremental Policy and State Legislative Action.

Engeman, Cassandra. (2015). How Social Movement Unionism Helped Shape the 2006 Immigrant Rights Marches in L.A. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1OMMN5M

Erkal, Nisvan, & Scotchmer, Suzanne. (2007). Scarcity of Ideas and Options to Invest in R&D (paper E07-348). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research.

Fabrizio, Kira R., & Mowery, David C. (2005). Defense-Related R&D and the Growth of the Postwar Information Technology Industrial Complex in the United States. Revue d'économie industrielle, 112(112), 27-44.

Fadel, Tarek, Morita, Shelah, & Mayfield, Michael. (2013). Stakeholder Perspectives on Perception, Assessment, and Management of the Potential Risks of Nanotechnology. In M. Panter, P. Johnson & G. Holdridge (Eds.), (pp. 74). Arlington: National nanotechnology Coordination Office.

Fagerberg, Jan, Mowery, David C., & Verspagen, Bart (Eds.). (2009). Innovation, path dependency and policy: the Norwegian case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fastman, Brandon, Metzger, Miriam, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2016). Forging new connections between nanoscience and society in the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society Science & Engineering Fellows Program. In Kurt Winkelmann & Bharat Bhushan (Eds), Global Perspectives of Nanoscience and Engineering Education (pp.375-393 ). Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31833-2_14

Foladori, Guillermo. (2011). Participación militar estadounidense en la ciencia y tecnología de México. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 19(7), 1-29.

Foladori, Guillermo. (2011). U.S. Military Involvement in Mexican Science and Technology. GlobalResearchCA: Global Research.

Foladori, Guillermo, & Invernizzi, Noela. (2012). Implicaciones sociales y ambientales del desarrollo de las nanotecnologías en América Latina y el Caribe. Zacatecas, Mexico and Curitiba, Brazil: ReLANS.

Foladori, Guillermo, & Invernizzi, Noela. (2012). Social and Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology Development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Zacatecas, Mexico and Curitiba, Brazil: ReLANS.

Foladori, Guillermo, Figueroa, Santiago, Záyago Lau, Edgar, & Invernizzi, Noela. (2012). Características distintivas del desarrollo de las nanotecnologías en América Latina. Sociológicas, 14(30), 330-363.

Foladori, Guillermo, Figueroa, Santiago, Záyago Lau, Edgar, & Invernizzi, Noela. (2012). Nanotechnology: Distinctive Features in Latin America. Nanotechnology Law & Business, 9(1), 88-103.

Foladori, Guillermo, Záyago Lau, Edgar, Appelbaum, Richard, & Parker, Rachel. (2012). Mexico-U.S. scientific collaboration in nanotechnology. Revista Frontera Norte (english edition) 24(48), 145-164.

Foladori, Guillermo. (2012). Achieving Equitable Outcomes Through Emerging Technologies: A Social Empowerment Approach. In R. Parker & R. Appelbaum (Eds.), Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development? (pp. 40-46). New York: Routledge.

Foladori, Guillermo, & Záyago Lau, Edgar. (2014). The Regulation of Nanotechnologies in Mexico. Nanotechnology Law & Business, 11, 164-171.

Foladori, Guillermo. (2014). Criterios sobre la regulación de las nanotecnologías. Observatorio del Desarrollo, 3(12), 9-14.

Foladori, Guillermo, Appelbaum, Richard, Invernizzi, Noela, & Záyago Lau, Edgar. (2014). Nanotecnologia y trabajadores: Declaracion de Curitiba. Observatorio del Desarrollo, 3(9), 73-75.

Foladori, Guillermo, & Záyago Lau, Edgar. (2015). La Regulacion de las Nanotecnologias en Mexico. Revista Legislativa de Estudios Sociales y de Opinion Publica, 7(14), 123-146.

Foladori, Guillermo, Arteaga Figueroa, Zayago Lau, Edgar, Appelbaum, Richard, Robles Belmont, Eduardo, Villa, Liliana, & Parker, Rachel. (2015). Relevancia y apoyo público de la Investigación en Nanotecnología en México. Revisita Anduli(14), 195-222. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/anduli.2015.i14.11

Foladori, Guillermo, Arteaga Figueroa, Záyago Lau, Edgar, Appelbaum, Richard, Robles-Belmont, Eduardo, Villa, Liliana, Parker, Rachel, & Leos, Vanessa. (2015). Nanotechnology in Mexico: Key Findings Based on OECD Criteria. Minerva, 53(3), 279-301. doi: 10.1007/s11024-015-9281-6

Foladori, Guillermo, Invernizzi, Noela, Appelbaum, Richard, Hasmy, Anwar, & Záyago Lau, Edgar. (2015). Trabajo, riesgos y regulación de las nanotecnologías en América Latina In G. Foladori, A. Hasmy, N. Invernizzi & E. Záyago Lau (Eds.), Trabajo, riesgos y regulación en América Latina (pp. 5-10). Mexico: D.F.: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.

Foladori, Guillermo, Arteaga Figueroa, Záyago Lau, Edgar, Robles Belmont, E, Appelbaum, Richard, & Parker, Rachel. (forthcoming). Patentes nanotecnológicas en México según sector económico de potencial aplicación. Ciencia Ergo Sum.

Foladori, Guillermo, Arteaga Figueroa, Ramon, Záyago Lau, Edgar, Robles Belmont, Eduardo, Appelbaum, Richard, & Parker, Rachel. (forthcoming). Sectores económicos de potencial aplicación de las patentes de nanotecnologías en México. Ciencia Ergo-Sum.

Frederick, Stacey. (2012). California in the Nano Economy. National Nanomanufacturing Network Newsletter, 5(8). doi: 10.4053/hi712-120829

Frederick, Stacey, Rogers-Brown, Jennifer, & Shearer, Christine. (2015). Nanotechnology in Society: An Overview. In T. Lindsey (Ed.), Short Subjects. Sacramento: California Research Bureau.

Freudenburg, William, & Collins, Mary. (2012). Public Responses to Nanotechnology: Risks to the Social Fabric? In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 241-264). New York: Routledge.

Friedman, Sharon, & Egolf, Brenda. (2011). A Longitudinal Study of Newspaper and Wire Service Coverage of Nanotechnology Risks. Risk Analysis, 31(11), 1701-1717.

Friedman, Sharon, & Egolf, Brenda. (2012). Perspective: What Have the Mass Media been Reporting on Nanotechnology Risks? In S. H. Priest (Ed.), Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication (pp. 157-165). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Friedman, Sharon, & Egolf, Brenda. (2015). Nanotechnology Health Risks: Is The Public Getting the Whole Story? JSM Nanotechnology & Nanomedicine, 3(1), 1036-1041.

García Guerrero, Miguel, & Foladori, Guillermo. (2014). Divulgación de nanotecnologías en España, Estados Unidos y México: la visión del papel de la sociedad en la nueva ola científico-tecnológica. Observatorio del Desarrollo, 3(12), 47-54.  http://estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/observatorio/ob12/12.pdf

Gavankar, Sheetal, Anderson, Sarah, & Keller, Arturo A. (2014). Critical Components of Uncertainty Communication in Life Cycle Assessments of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(3), 463-479. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12183

Godwin, H. A., Chopra, K., Bradley, K. A., Cohen, Y., Harthorn, B. H., Hoek, E. M., Holden, P., Keller, A. A., Lenihan, H. S., Nisbet, R. M., & Nel, A. E. (2009). The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environ Sci Technol, 43(17), 6453-6457.

Gregory, Robin, Satterfield, Terre, & Hasell, Ariel. (2016). Using decision pathway surveys to inform climate engineering policy choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 560-565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508896113

Han, Shirley. (2014). Tiananmen Square 25 Years Later.   http://www.independent.com/news/2014/jun/04/tiananmen-square-25-years-la...

Han, Shirley (Producer). (2015). STEMming reverse brain drain: what would make foreign students stay in the US? The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/stemming-reverse-brain-drain-what-would-make...

Han, Xueying, Engeman, Cassandra, Appelbaum, Richard, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2015). Democratizing Technologies: Assessing the Roles of NGOs in Shaping Technological Futures. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara. http://www.cns.ucsb.edu/sites/www.cns.ucsb.edu/files/demtech/Democratizing%20Technologies%20Conference%20Report.pdf

Han, Xueying, Stocking, Galen, Gebbie, Matthew A., & Appelbaum, Richard. (2015). Will They Stay or Will They Go? International Graduate Students and Their Decisions to Stay or Leave the U.S. upon Graduation. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0118183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118183

Han, Shirley, & Appelbaum, Richard. (2016). Will They Stay or Will They Go?  International STEM Students Are Up for Grabs. Kaufman Foundation.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2006). Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies Anthropology News (Vol. 47, pp. 26): John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, McCray, W. Patrick, & Satterfield, Terre. (2006). Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology, 28(2), 38-40.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2009). Reflections from Dr. Barbara Herr Harthorn A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (pp. 43).

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Bryant, Karl, & Rogers, Jennifer. (2009). Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. Paper presented at the University of Washington Center for Workforce Development, Seattle, WA. http://depts.washington.edu/ntethics/symposium/index.shtml

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Pidgeon, Nick, & Satterfield, Terre. (2009). Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology AZoM.com: AZoM.com

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Rogers, Jennifer, & Shearer, Christine. (2010). Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Paper presented at the Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting, Santa Barbara, CA.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2010). Amplification of Risk. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 669-670). London: Sage.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2010). Attenuation of Risk. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 671-672). London: Sage.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2010). Gender and Nanotechnology. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 269-271). London: Sage.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2010). Public participation in nanotechnology – should we care? 2020 Science.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2011). Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research (pp. 65-88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Shearer, Christine, & Rogers, Jennifer. (2011). Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. In T. Zuelsdorf (Ed.), Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies (pp. 75-89). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Mohr, John W. (2012). Introduction: The Social Scientific View of Nanotechnologies. In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 1-15). New York: Routledge.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Mohr, John W. (Eds.). (2012). The Social Life of Nanotechnology. New York: Routledge.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Rogers, Jennifer, Shearer, Christine, & Martin, Tyronne. (2012). Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment. In D. Scott & B. Francis (Eds.), Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good (2nd ed., pp. 227-249). New York: Prometheus Books.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Shearer, Christine, & Rogers, Jennifer. (2012). Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. In R. Parker & R. Appelbaum (Eds.), Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development? (pp. 188-197). New York: Routledge.

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2016). Envisioning Our Nano-Medical Futures: Techno-Benefits and Social Risks? In L. Manderson, E. Cartwright & A. Hardon (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Medical Anthropology, (section 14.5 pp 329-337). London: Routledge. ISBN-13: 978-1138015630  ISBN-10: 1138015636  

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2016). Unifying ethical concepts. In W. Bainbridge, W. Sims & M. Roco (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence, ch. 54. Switzerland: Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. SBN-13: 978-3319070513 ISBN-10: 3319070517 (March 2016). Online publication 2015 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04133-2_54-1

Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (forthcoming). Nanotechnology. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Wiley-Blackwell.

Hegde, Deepak, & Mowery, David C. (2008). Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system. Science, 322(5909), 1797-1798. doi: 10.1126/science.1158562

Henderson, Jeffrey, Appelbaum, Richard P., & Ho, Suet Ying. (2013). Globalization with Chinese Characteristics: Externalization, Dynamics and Transformations. Development and Change, 44(6), 1221-1253. doi: 10.1111/dech.12066

Henwood, Karen L., & Pidgeon, Nick. (2015). Gender, ethical voices and UK nuclear energy policy in the post-Fukushima era. In B. T. a. S. Roeser (Ed.), The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the post-Fukushima era (pp. 67-84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Henwood, Karen L., & Pidgeon, Nick. (2016). Interpretive Environmental Risk Research: Affect, discourses and Change. In J. Crichton, C. N. Candlin & A. S. Firkins (Eds.), Communicating Risk (pp. 155-170). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Herron, Patrick, & Lenoir, Tim. (2009). Tracking the Current Rise of Chinese Pharmaceutical Bionanotechnology. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Innovation, 4(8 (October)), 38.

Hodges, Heather E., & Stocking, Galen. (2016). A pipeline of tweets: environmental movements’ use of Twitter in response to the Keystone XL pipeline. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 223-247. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1105177

Holden, Patricia A., Gardea-Torresdey, Jorge. L., Klaessig, Fred, Turco, Ronald. F., Mortimer, Monika, Hund-Rinke, Kerstin, . . . Nel, Andre E. (2016). Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(12), 6124-6145. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00608

Horton, Zach. (2013). Collapsing Scale: Nanotechnology and Geoengineering as Speculative Media. In H. van Lente, C. Coenen, T. Fleischer, K. Konrad, L. Krabbenborg, C. Milburn, F. Siefert & F. Thoreau (Eds.), Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies (pp. 203-218). Dordrecht: AKA-Verlag/IOS Press.

Howe, Cymene, Lockrem, Jessica, Appel, Hannah, Hackett, Edward, Boyer, Dominic, Hall, Randal, Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew, Pope, Albert, Gupta, Akhil, Rodwell, Elizabeth, Ballestero, Andrea, Durbin, Trevor, el-Dahdah, Fares, Long, Elizabeth, & Mody, Cyrus. (2015). Paradoxical Infrastructures: Ruins, Retrofit, and Risk. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(3), 547-565. doi: 10.1177/0162243915620017

            http://estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/pagina_tipo_uno.php?seccion=pub_observatorio12

Invernizzi, Noela. (2012). Implications of Nanotechnology for Labor and Employment: Assessing Nanotechnology Products in Brazil. In R. Parker & R. Appelbaum (Eds.), Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development? (pp. 140-152). New York: Routledge.

Invernizzi, Noela, & Foladori, Guillermo. (forthcoming). Nanotechnology Implications for Labor. In R. Bawa, G. F. Audette & I. Rubinstein (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Nanomedicine Law, Business, Regulation, Safety, and Risk (Vol. 2). Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing.

Jae-Young, Choi, Ramachandra, Gurumurthy, & Kandlikar, Milind. (2009). The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environmental Science and Technology, 43(9), 3030-3034.

Johansson, Mikael. (2009). Next to nothing: A Study of Scientists and their Cosmology at a Swedish Research Laboratory. Sweden: Gothenburg University.

Johansson, Mikael. (2010). Nano Culture. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society, 462-463. London: Sage Publications.

Johansson, Mikael. (2011). Technological Utopia. The Sage reference series on green society: toward a sustainable future. Technology 10, 408-409.

Johansson, Mikael. (2012). Working for Next to Nothing - Labor in the Global Nanoscientific Community. In B. H. Harthorn & J. W. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 88-110). New York: Routledge.

Kaiser, David, & McCray, Patrick (Eds.). (2016). Groovy Science: Knowledge, Innovation, and American Counterculture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kandlikar, Milind, Ramachandran, Gurumurthy, Maynard, Andrew, Murdock, Barbara, & Toscano, William. (2007). Health Risk Assessment for Nanoparticles: A Case for Using Expert Judgment. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9(1), 137-156.

Kandlikar, Milind, Jani, C, & Dowlatabadi, H. (2015). Emerging Technologies and Life Cycle Management: Closing the Loop on Lithium Ion Batteries Used in Electric Vehicles.

Kaplan, Sarah, Milde, Jonathan, & Cowan, Ruth. (2016). Symbiont Practices in Boundary Spanning: Bridging The Cognitive and Political Divides in Interdisciplinary Research. Academy of Management Journal. doi: 10.5465/amj.2015.0809

Kay, Luciano, & Youtie, Jan. (2013). Corporate Strategies in Emerging Technologies: The Case of Chinese Firms and Energy Storage-Related Nanotechnology Applications. In K. Konrad, C. Coenen, A. Dijkstra, C. Milburn & H. van Lente (Eds.), Shaping Emerging Technologies: Governance, Innovation, Discourse. Berlin, Germany: IOS Press / AKA.

Kay, Luciano, Newman, Nils, Youtie, Jan, Porter, Alan L., & Rafols, Ismael. (2014). Patent overlay mapping: Visualizing technological distance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2432-2443. doi: 10.1002/asi.23146

Kay, Luciano, Youtie, Jan, & Shapira, Philip. (2014). Inter-industry knowledge flows and sectoral networks in the economy of Malaysia. Knowl Manage Res Prac. 1-15.

Kay, Luciano, Youtie, Jan, & Shapira, Philip. (2014). Signs of Things to Come? What Patent Submissions by Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Say About Corporate Strategies in Emerging Technologies. Technology Forecasting and Social Change. 85, 17-25.

Kay, Luciano, Newman, Nils, Porter, Alan, Rafols, Ismael, & Youtie, Jan. (2015). Mapping Graphene Science and Development. Bulletin of the Association for Information and Technology, 41(2), 22-25.

Kay, Luciano, Appelbaum, Richard, Youtie, Jan, & Shapira, Philip. (forthcoming). Nanotechnology in Argentina and Brazil: Innovation Pathways of developing countries in emerging technologies. Technology Forecasting and Social Change.

Kay, Luciano, Porter, Alan, Youtie, Jan, Newman, Nils, & Rafols, Ismael. (forthcoming). Visual analysis of patent data through global maps and overlays. In M. Lupu, N. Kando, T. Trippe & K. Mayer (Eds.), Current Challenges in Patent Information Retrieval: Springer.

Kelly, Kevin F., & Mody, Cyrus. (2015). The booms and busts of molecular electronics. Spectrum, IEEE, 52(10), 52-60. doi: 10.1109/MSPEC.2015.7274196

Lécuyer, Christophe, & Choi, Hyungsub. (forthcoming). How Did Semiconductor Firms Manage Technological Uncertainty? La Revue d'Histoire Moderne at Contemporaine.

Lenoir, Timothy, & Giannella, Eric. (2006). The Emergence and Diffusion of DNA Microarray Technology. Jenkins Collaboratory for New Technologies in Society, 1, 11. doi: 1747-5333-1-11 [pii] 10.1186/1747-5333-1-11

Lenoir, Timothy, & Gianella, Eric. (2008). Technological Platforms and the Layers of Patent Data. In E. Gianella, M. Biagioli, P. Jaszi & M. Woodmansee (Eds.), Con/Texts of Invention: Creative Production in Legal and Cultural Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lenoir, Tim, & Herron, Patrick. (2015). The NCI and the Takeoff of Nanomedicine. Journal of Nanomedicine & Biotherapeutic Discovery, 05(03), 135. doi: 10.4172/2155-983x.1000135

Lively, Erica, Conroy, Meredith, Weaver, David, & Bimber, Bruce. (2012). News Media Frame Novel Technologies in a Familiar Way: Nanotechnology, Applications, and Progress. In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 223-240). New York: Routledge.

Macher, Jeffrey T., Mowery, David C., & Minin, Alberto Di. (2007). The “Non-Globalization” of Innovation in the Semiconductor Industry. California Management Review, 50(1), 27.

Macher, Jeffery T., & Mowery, David C. (2008). Introduction: Running Faster to Keep Up Running Faster to Keep Up: Globalization of R&D and U.S Economic Welfare: National Academies Press.

Macher, Jeffrey T., Mowery, David C., & Minin, Alberto Di. (2008). The “Non-Globalization” of Innovation in the Semiconductor Industry Running Faster to Keep Up: Globalization of R&D and U.S Economic Welfare (pp. 217-243): National Academies Press.

Majewski, John. (2015). Not All Inequality is the Same. Report for the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, History of Technology series, Washington, DC, December 10. http://equitablegrowth.org/report/not-all-inequality-is-the-same/

Maldonado, Julie, Shearer, Christine, & Bronen, Robin. (forthcoming). Climate Change, Displacement and Tribal Communities: Road Map for Adaptation Policies. Climactic Change.

McCarty, Philip, Lively, Erica, Weaver, David, Mohr, John, & Bimber, Bruce. (2008). The Role of Governmental and Non-Governmental Institutions in Framing Nanotechnology as a Social Issue. Santa Barbara, CA.

McCray, W. Patrick. (2005). Will Small Be Beautiful? Making Policies for Our Nanotech Future. History and Technology, 21(2), 177-203.

McCray, W. Patrick. (2007). MBE deserves a place in the history books. Nature Nanotechnology, 2(5), 259-261.

McCray, W. Patrick, Mody, Cyrus C. M., & Roberts, Jody. (2007). Letter to the Editor Regarding Nanoethics The New Atlantis (Vol. 17).

McCray, W. Patrick. (2008). It’s Just Like That, Except Different. The Power of Analogy In Describing Nanotechnology. Science Progress.

McCray, W. Patrick. (2009). From lab to iPod: A Story of Discovery and Commercialization in the Post-Cold War Era. Technology and Culture, 50(1), 58-81.

McCray, W. Patrick (2009). How Spintronics Went from the Lab to the iPod. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(1), 1-3.

McCray, W. Patrick. (2010). Unintended Consequences: What Ten Years of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Can Teach Us About Federal R&D.  Retrieved from http://www.scienceprogress.org/2010/03/unintended-consequences/

McCray, W. Patrick. (2012). "A pioneer in space and on Earth," editorial.  Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/10/opinion/mccray-elon-musk/index.html

McCray, W. Patrick. (2012). California Dreamin': Visioneering the Technological Future. In V. Janssen (Ed.), Minds and Matters: Technology in California and the West (pp. 347-378). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

McCray, W. Patrick. (2012). From L-5 to X-Prize. In P. J. Westwick & W. Deverell (Eds.), Blue Sky Metropolis: Aerospace and Southern California (pp. 171-193). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

McCray, W. Patrick. (2012). When Space Travel and Nanotechnology Met at the Fountains of Paradise. In B. H. Harthorn & J. W. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 37-51). New York: Routledge.

McCray, W. Patrick. (2012, November 26). "We May Not Have Flying Cars Yet, But Visioneers are Inventing a New Future," opinion piece. Forbes.com.

McCray, W. Patrick. (2013). The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

McCray, Patrick. (2014). How Astronomers Digitized The Sky. Technology and Culture, 55(4), 908-944. doi: 10.1353/tech.2014.0102

McCray, Patrick. (2014). The Technologists' Siren Song. The Chronicle Review. http://chronicle.com/article/The-Technologists-Siren-Song/145107/

McCray, Patrick. (forthcoming). Gravity and Geese. Leonardo.

Mehta, Aashish, Herron, Patrick, Motoyama, Yasuyuki, Appelbaum, Richard, & Lenoir, Tim. (2012). Globalization and De-globalization in Nanotechnology Research: The Role of China. Scientometrics, 93(2), 439-458. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0687-8

Mehta, Aashish, Herron, Patrick James, Cao, Cong, & Lenoir, Tim. (2016). Research Diversification and Impact: The Case of National Nanoscientific Development. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2359278

Mody, Cyrus. (2005). MacDiarmid, Alan G. Oral History Interview. Philadelphia, PA: Chemical Heritage Foundation.

Mody, Cyrus. (2005). Smith, Henry I. Oral History Interview. Philadelphia, PA: Chemical Heritage Foundation.

Mody, Cyrus. (2006). Corporations, Universities, and Instrumental Communities: Commercializing Probe Microscopy, 1981–1996. Technology and Culture, 47(1), 38-40.

Mody, Cyrus. (2006). Nanotechnology and the Modern University. Practicing Anthropology, 47(1), 56-80.

Mody, Cyrus. (2006). Heeger, Alan J. Oral History Interview. Philadelphia, PA: Chemical Heritage Foundation.

Mody, Cyrus. (2006). Williams, R. Stanley Oral History Interview. Philadelphia, PA: Chemical Heritage Foundation.

Mody, Cyrus. (2007). Some Thoughts on Why History Matters in Understanding the Social Issues of Nanotechnology and Other Converging Technologies. Nanoethics.

Mody, Cyrus. (2007). Hansma, Paul K. Oral History Interview. Chemical Heritage Foundation: Chemical Heritage Foundation.

Mody, Cyrus. (2007). Murday, James S. Oral History Interview. Philadelphia, PA: Chemical Heritage Foundation.

Mody, Cyrus. (2008). The Larger World of Nano. Physics Today, 61(10), 38-44.

Mody, Cyrus. (2008). How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, the Nuclear Reactor, the Computer, Ham Radio, and Recombinant DNA. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 38(3), 451-461.

Mody, Cyrus. (2008). Scientific Training and the Creation of Scientific Knowledge. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Wajcman (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (3rd ed., pp. 377-402). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (2009). Instruments of Commerce and Knowledge: Probe Microscopy, 1980-2000. In R. Freeman & D. Goroff (Eds.), Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment (pp. 291-319). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (2009). Introduction [special issue on the history of nanotechnology]. Perspectives on Science, 17(2), 111-122.

Mody, Cyrus, & McCray, W. Patrick. (2009). Big Whig History and Nano Narratives: Effective Innovation Policy Needs the Historical Dimension.  Retrieved from http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/04/big-whig-history-and-nano-narrati...

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 76-78). London: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Chronology of Nanoscience. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. xxxiii-xliii). London: Sage Publications.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). IBM. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 325-328). London: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Institutions as Stepping-Stones: Rick Smalley and the Commercialization of Nanotubes Studies in Materials Innovation, Chemical Heritage Foundation (pp. 1-26).

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Integrated Circuits: Material, Social, Spatial. Volume [Journal of the Columbia Laboratory for Architectural Broadcasting], 24(Counterculture), 44-49. http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~Cyrus.Mody/MyPubs/IntegratedCircuits.pdf

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Interdisciplinary Research Centers. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 348-350). London: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). International Council on Nanotechnology. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 351-353). London: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Microscopies, Exotic. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 419-421). London: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Microscopy, Atomic Force. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 416-417). London: Sage Publications.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Microscopy, Electron (Including TEM and SEM). In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 417-419). London: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Microscopy, Optical. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 421-422). London: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Microscopy, Scanning Probe. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 423-424). London: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). Microscopy, Scanning Tunneling. In D. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 424-425). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus. (2010). National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.). In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 580-581). London: Sage.

Mody, Cyrus, & Lynch, Michael. (2010). Test Objects and Other Epistemic Things: A History of a Nanoscale Object. British Journal for the History of Science 43(3), 423-458.

Mody, Cyrus. (2011). Climbing the Hill: Seeing (and Not Seeing) Epochal Breaks from Multiple Vantage Points. In A. Nordmann, H. Radder & G. Schiemann (Eds.), Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break (pp. 54-65). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (2011). Instrumental Community: Probe Microscopy and the Path to Nanotechnology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (2011). Review of Nanoethics: Big Ethical Issues with Small Technology by Dónal P. O’Mathúna. Technology and Culture, 52, 49-51.

Mody, Cyrus. (2012). Conferences and the Emergence of Nanoscience. In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 52-65. London: Routledge.

Mody, Cyrus. (2012). Conversions: Sound and Sight, Military and Civilian. In T. Pinch & K. Bijsterveld (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies (pp. 224-248). New York: Oxford University Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (2013). Limits Be Damned: Review of How a Group of Elite Scientists  Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future. Nature, 493, 24-25.

Mody, Cyrus. (2013). Santa Barbara, Physics, and the Long 1970s. Physics Today, 66(9), 31-37.

Mody, Cyrus, & Choi, Hyungsub. (2013). From Material Science to Nanotechnology: Institutions, Communities, and Disciplines at Cornell University, 1960-2000. Historical Studies in Natural Sciences, 43(2), 121-161.

Mody, Cyrus, & Nelson, Andrew J. (2013). ‘A Towering Virtue of Necessity’: Computer Music at Vietnam-Era Stanford. Osiris, 28, 254-277.

Mody, Cyrus. (2014). Essential Tensions and Representational Strategies. In M. Lynch, S. Woolgar, J. Vertesi & C. Coopmans (Eds.), Representation in Scientific Practices Revisited (pp. 223-248). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (2014). Nanotechnology. In H. Slotten (Ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of American Scientific, Medical, and Technological History. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (2014). Probe Microscopy: A Transdisciplinary and Transatlantic Instrumental Community. Bunsen-Magazin, 16(5), 214-219.

Mody, Cyrus. (2014). STARS: Scanning Probe Microscopy [Scanning Our Past]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(7), 1107-1112. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2326811

Mody, Cyrus. (2014). University in a Garage: Instrumentation and Innovation from UC Santa Barbara. In M. Kenney, D. Mowery & M. Walshok (Eds.), The Role of the University of California in Building Regional Economies through Knowledge Creation and Transfer (pp. 153-179). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (2015). Responsible Innovation at the Dawn of the Post-Industrial Society, Report for the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, Washington, DC. http://equitablegrowth.org/report/responsible-innovation/

Mody, Cyrus. (2015). Scientific Practice and Science Education. Science Education, 99(6), 1026-1032. doi: 10.1002/sce.21190

Mody, Cyrus. (2015). What Kind of Thing Is Moore's Law? IEEE Spectrum (online forum).

Mody, Cyrus. (2016). An Electro-Historical Focus with Real Interdisciplinary Appeal: Interdisciplinarity at Vietnam-Era Stanford. In S. Frickel, B. Prainsack & M. Albert (Eds.), Investigating Interdisciplinary Research: Theory and Practice across Disciplines. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (2016). Professional Science. In B. Lightman (Ed.), Blackwell Companion to the History of Science (pp. 164-178). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Mody, Cyrus. (2016). Responsible Innovation: The 1970s, Today, and the Implications for Equitable Growth. Report for the Washington Center for Equitable Growth. Washington, DC. Feb 8 2016

Mody, Cyrus. (2016). Santa Barbara Physicists in the Vietnam Era. In D. Kasier & W. P. McCray (Eds.), Groovy Science: Knowledge, Innovation, and American Counterculture (pp. 70-106). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mody, Cyrus. (forthcoming). Discussion Forum on Scientific Practice. Science Education.

Mody, Cyrus. (forthcoming). Fabricating an Organizational Field for Research: US Academic Microfabrication Facilities in the 1970s and 1980s. In T. Heinze & R. Münch (Eds.), Intellectual and Organizational Innovation in Science: Historical and Sociological Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mody, Cyrus. (forthcoming). Moore's Law. In A. Shew & J. C. Pitt (Eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. London: Routledge.

Mody, Cyrus. (forthcoming). The Long Arm of Moore's Law: Microelectronics and American Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Motoyama, Yasuyuki, & Eisler, Matthew N. (2011). Bibliometry and Nanotechnology: A Meta-Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1174-1182. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.013

Motoyama, Yasuyuki, Appelbaum, Richard P., & Parker, Rachel. (2011). The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal Support for Science and Technology, or Hidden Industrial Policy? Technology in Society, 33(1-2), 109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.010

Motoyama, Yasuyuki, Cao, Cong, & Appelbaum, Richard. (2014). Observing regional divergence of Chinese nanotechnology centers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81(0), 11-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.013

Motoyama, Yasuyuki. (2014). Long-term collaboration between university and industry: A case study of nanotechnology development in Japan. Technology in Society, 36(0), 39-51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.09.001

Mowery, David C. (2009). What Does Economic Theory Tell us about Mission-Oriented R&D? In D. Foray (Ed.), The New Economics of Technology Policy (pp. 131-148 ). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Mowery, David C. (2009). Pioneering Inventors or Thicket-Builders: Which U.S. Firms Use Continuations in Patenting? Management Science. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1016

Mowery, David C. (2009). National Security and National Innovation Systems. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(5), 455-473. doi: 10.1007/s10961-008-9100-4

Mowery, David C. (2009). Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the 'Third Industrial Revolution'. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(1), 1-50.

Mowery, David C. (2009). Notes in IPR and US economic 'catch-up'. Paper presented at the Graduate Institute for Policy Studies Conference on Intellectual Property Rights and Economic "Catch-up".

Mowery, David C., Fagerberg, Jan, & Verspagen, Bart. (2009). Innovation, Path-Dependency, and Policy: The Evolution of Norway's National Innovation System. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 431-444.

Mowery, David C. (2010). Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch-Up: An International Comparative Study. In H. Odagiri, A. Goto, A. Sunami & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch-Up: An International Comparative Study. Tokyo, Japan Oxford University Press.

Mowery, David. (2010). Alfred Chandler and Knowledge Management Within the Firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(2), 483–507.

Mowery, David. (2010). Nanotechnology and the U.S. National Innovation System:  Continuity and Change. In U. Fiedeler, C. Coenen, S. R. Davies & A. Ferrari (Eds.), Understanding Nanotechnology (pp. 85-99). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Mowery, David. (2011). Federal Policy and the Development of Semiconductors, Computer Hardware, and Computer software: A policy Model for Climate-Change R&D? In R. Henderson & R. G. Newell (Eds.), Accelerating Energy Innovation: Lesson from Multiple Sectors (pp. 159 - 188). Cambridge, MA: NBER.

Mowery, David. (2011). Nanotechnology and the US National Innovation System: Continuity and Change. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9210-2

Murr, Meredith M., Patterson, Stacy E., Hu, Evelyn L., Goodchild, Fiona M., & McCray, W. Patrick. (2009). From the Ground Up: Developing an Interdisciplinary Course Focusing on Materials Science and Society in Green Technologies. Journal of Materials Education, 31(5/6), 251-264.

Negoita, Marian, & Block, Fred. (2012). Networks and Public Policies in the Global South:  The Chilean Case and the Future of the Developmental Network State. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47, 1-22. doi: 10.1007/s12116-012-9097-4

Neuman, Daniel, Ostrowski, Alexis D., Absalonson, Ryan O., Strouse, Geoffrey F., & Ford, Peter C. (2007). Photosensitized NO Release from Water-Soluble Nanoparticle Assemblies Journal of the American Chemical Society, 129(14), 2.

Neuman, Daniel, Ostrowski, Alexis D., Mikhailovsky, Alexander A., Absalonson, Ryan O., Strouse, Geoffrey F., & Ford, Peter C. (2008). Quantum Dot Fluorescence Quenching Pathways with Cr(III) Complexes. Photosensitized NO Production from trans-Cr(cyclam)(ONO)2+. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 130, 168-175.

Newfield, Christopher. (2007). Passé et passif de l'enseignement supérieur américain,Le Monde Diplomatique, pp. 6-7. Retrieved from http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2007/09/NEWFIELD/15109

Newfield, Christopher. (2008). Unmaking the Public University: The 40-Year Assault on the Middle Class Cambridge: Harvard University

Newfield, Christopher. (2009). Risky Business: Why Public Is Losing to Private in American Research. Polygraph, 21(October), 77-95.

Newfield, Christopher. (2009). Structure et silence du cognitariat. Multitudes, 39(October), 69-78.

Newfield, Christopher. (2009). L'Université et la revanche des 'élites' aux États-Unis,La Revue Internationale Des Livres & Des Idées, pp. 28-29. Retrieved from http://www.revuedeslivres.onoma6.com/articles.php?idArt=343&PHPSESSID=aa...

Newfield, Chris. (2010). Avoiding Network Failure: The Case of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. In F. Block & M. Keller (Eds.), State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.

Newfield, Chris. (2010). Is the Corporation a Social Partner? The Case of Nanotechnology. In P. Bose & L. E. Lyons (Eds.), Cultural critique and the global corporation (pp. 215-224). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Newfield, Chris. (2010). Review of Steve Shapin, The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation. Technology and Culture, 51(4), 1058-1060.

Newfield, Chris. (2010). Science out of the Shadows: Public Nanotechnology and Social Welfare. Occasion: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 2, 1-19.

Newfield, Chris, & Barnett, Gerald. (2010). The Federal Stimulus Should Support Research at Public Universities, commentary,Chronicle of Higher Education, January 3. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/The-Federal-Stimulus-Should/63354/

Newfield, Chris. (2011). Was the Innovation Economy Killed by the Debt Debate?  Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christopher-newfield/innovation-economy-de...

Newfield, Chris. (2012). Can Selective Immigration Help the Innovation Crisis?  Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christopher-newfield/can-selective-immigra...

Newfield, Chris. (2012). Does Solar Energy Need a New Innovation Model?  The Case of Germany. In H. van Lente, C. Coenen, T. Fleischer, K. Konrad, L. Krabbenborg, C. Milburn, F. Siefert & F. Thoreau (Eds.), Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies (pp. 135-155). Dordrecht: AKA-Verlag/IOS Press.

Newfield, Chris. (2012). Is Nanoscale Collaboration Meeting Nanotechnology’s Social Challenge? A Call for Nano-Normalcy. In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 69-87). New York: Routledge.

Newfield, Chris. (2012, April 30, 2012). Apple's Attack on the Knowledge Economy.  Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christopher-newfield/apples-attack-on-the-...

Newfield, Chris. (2014, August 5, 2014). How Can Public Universities Pay for Research? . Remaking the University. from http://utotherescue.blogspot.com/2014/08/how-can-public-research-univers...

Newfield, Chris. (2014, June 2014). Christensen’s Disruptive Innovation after the Lepore Critique. AAUP Academe Blog. from http://academeblog.org/2014/06/25/christensens-disruptive-innovation-aft...

Newfield, Chris. (2014, September 17, 2014). Some Implications of the Regents' Proposed UC Ventures. Remaking the University. from http://utotherescue.blogspot.com/2014/09/some-implications-of-regents-pr...

Newfield, Chris, & Boudreaux, Daryl. (2014). Learning From Solyndra: Filling Gaps in the US Innovation System. In S. Ramani, V. (Ed.), Nanotechnology and Development: What's In It for Emerging Countries? (pp. 39-72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Novak, David. (2013). Performing Antinuclear Movements In Post-3.11 Japan.  Retrieved from http://fukushimaforum.wordpress.com/online-forum-2/second-3-11-virtual-c...

Novak, David. (2013). The Sounds of Japan's Antinuclear Movement.  Retrieved from http://post.at.moma.org/content_items/251-podcast-the-sounds-of-japan-s-...

Novak, David. (2014). Disturbance. In D. Naito, R. Sayre, H. Swanson & S. Takahashi (Eds.), To See Once More the Stars: Living in a Post-Fukushima World (pp. 99-102). Santa Cruz: New Pacific Press.

Ostrowski, Alexis D., Martin, Tyronne, Conti, Joseph A., Hurt, Indy, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2009). Nanotoxicology: Characterizing the Scientific Literature: 2000-2007. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11, 251-257.

Parker, Rachel, Ridge, Claron, Cao, Cong, & Appelbaum, Richard (2009). China’s Nanotechnology Patent Landscape: An Analysis of Invention Patents Filed with the State Intellectual Property Office. Nanotechnology Law and Business, 6(Winter), 524-539.

Parker, Rachel. (2010). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: High-tech Industry Growth in China. University of California, Santa Barbara.  

Parker, Rachel, & Appelbaum, Richard. (2010). Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Water Filtration Systems: From New Material Innovation to New Product Innovation. New Materials Innovation, 1-31.

Parker, Rachel, & Appelbaum, Richard (Eds.). (2012). Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development? New York: Routledge.

Parker, Rachel, & Appelbaum, Richard. (2012). Introduction: The Promise and Perils of High-Tech Approaches to Development, introductory chapter. In R. Parker & R. Appelbaum (Eds.), Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development? (pp. 1-20). New York: Routledge.

Parker, Rachel, & Appelbaum, Richard. (2012). The Chinese Century? Some Implications of China’s Move to High-Tech Innovation for U.S. Policy. In B. H. Harthorn & J. W. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 134-165). New York: Routledge.

Parkhill, Karen, Demski, Christina, Butler, Catherine, Spence, Alexa, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2013). Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability: Synthesis Report (pp. 1-48). UKERC: London.

Parkhill, Karen, Pidgeon, Nick, Corner, Adam, & Vaughan, Naomi. (2013). Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. In R. Owen, J. Bessant & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation (pp. 219-240). London: Wiley.

Partridge, Tristan. (2015). Recoupling Groups Who Resist: Dimensions of Difference, Opposition and Affirmation. Journal of Resistance Studies, 1(2), 12-50.

Partridge, Tristan. (2015). The Páramo, Where Water is Born. Farming Matters, 31, 8-9.

Partridge, Tristan. (2016). Unconventional Action and Community Control: Rerouting Dependencies Despite the Hydrocarbon Economy ExtrACTION: Impacts, Engagements and Alternative Futures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

Partridge, Tristan. (forthcoming). Rural intersections: Resource marginalization and the “non-Indian problem” in highland Ecuador. Journal of Rural Studies, 1-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.001

Pidgeon, Nick. (2006). Opportunities and Uncertainties: The British Nanotechnologies Report and the Case for Upstream Societal Dialogue. In K. Andersson (Ed.), Valdor 2006: values in decisions on risk: proceedings, 371-378. Stockholm: Congrex Sweden.

Pidgeon, Nick. (2006). Risk and uncertainty. Trust in science: The Dialogue With Society, 40-45. Berlin: Ernst Schering Foundation and the British Council.

Pidgeon, Nick, & Rogers-Hayden, Tee. (2007). Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’? Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue, 9(2), 191-210. doi: 10.1080/13698570701306906

Pidgeon, Nick. (2008). Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. In G. Bammer & M. Smithson (Eds.), Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 349-361). London: Earthscan

Pidgeon, Nick. (2009). Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (pp. 32).

Pidgeon, Nick, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Bryant, Karl, & Rogers-Hayden, Tee. (2009). Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(2), 95-98. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.362

Pidgeon, Nick, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Satterfield, Terre. (2010). Nanotech: Good or Bad? The Chemical Engineer, 37-39.

Pidgeon, Nick, Satterfield, Terre, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr, editors. (2011). Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis, 31(11), 1649-1783. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x

Pidgeon, Nick, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Satterfield, Terre. (2011). Introduction: Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue), 31(11), 1694–1700. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x

Pidgeon, Nick, & Fischhoff, Baruch. (2011). The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change, 1(1). doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1080

Pidgeon, Nick. (2012). Opinion: Shale gas and public acceptability. Ingenia (52), 10-11.

Pidgeon, Nick, Corner, Adam, Parkhill, Karen, Spence, Alexa, Butler, Catherine, & Poortinga, Wouter. (2012). Exploring early responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (A), 307(1974), 4176-4196.

Pidgeon, Nick, Parkhill, Karen, Corner, Adam, & Vaughan, Naomi. (2013). Deliberating Stratospheric Aerosols for Climate Geoengineering and the SPICE Project. Nature Climate Change, 3(5), 451-457. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1807

Pidgeon, Nick, Demski, Christina, Butler, Catherine, Parkhill, Karen, & Spence, Alexa. (2014). Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(Suppl 4), 13606-13613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317512111

Pidgeon, Nick, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Satterfield, Terre, & Demski, Christina. (forthcoming). Cross-National Comparative Communication and Deliberation about the Risks of Nanotechnologies. In K. H. Jamieson, D. Scheufele & D. Kahan (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Science Communication: Oxford University Press.

Pidgeon, Nick, Thomas, Merryn, Partridge, Tristan, Evensen, Darrick, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (forthcoming). Hydraulic Fracturing - A Risk for Environment, Energy Security and Affordability? In Kasperson Roger (Ed.),Risk Conundrums: Solving Unsolvable Problems.

Powers, Christina M, Grieger, Khara D, Beaudrie, Christian, Hendren, Christine Ogilvie, Michael Davis, J., Wang, Amy, Sayes, Christie M, MacDonell, Margaret, & Gift, Jeffrey S. (2015). Data dialogues: critical connections for designing and implementing future nanomaterial research. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(1), 76-87. doi: 10.1007/s10669-014-9518-1

Putnam, L., Kisselburgh, L. G., Berkelaar, B. L., Buzzanell, P. M., Mastronardi, M., Jackson, M., Stoltzfus, K., Jorgenson, J., & Wang, J. (2009). 21st century STEM careers: Communication perspectives and research opportunities. In L. Harter & M. J. Dutta (Eds.), Engaging communication theory, research and pedagogy to communicate for social impact. New York: Hampton Press.

Randles, Sally, Youtie, Jan, Guston, David, Harthorn, Barbara, Newfield, Chris, Wickson, Fern, Rip, Arie, von Schomberg, Rene, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2012). A Transatlantic Conversation on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Governance. In H. van Lente, C. Coenen, T. Fleischer, K. Konrad, L. Krabbenborg, C. Milburn, F. Siefert & F. Thoreau (Eds.), Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies (pp. 169-180). Dordrecht: AKA-Verlag/IOS Press.

Rayner, Steve, Clare, Heyward, Kruger, Tim, Pidgeon, Nick, Redgwell, Catherine, & Savulescu, Julian. (2013). The Oxford Principles. Climactic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2

Roco, Mihail, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Guston, David, & Shapira, Philip. (2011). Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13(9), 3557-3590. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4

Roco, Mihail, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Guston, David, & Shapira, Philip. (2011). Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. In M. Roco & M. C. Hersam (Eds.), Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020 (pp. 561-618). New York: Springer.

Rogers, Jennifer. (2010). Center for Nanotechnology in Society-UC Santa Barbara. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 80-82). London: Sage.

Rogers, Jennifer. (2010). Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 261-262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rogers, Jennifer. (2010). iPod Nano. In D. H. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (pp. 363-365). London: Sage.

Rogers-Brown, Jennifer, Shearer, Christine, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2011). From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 2(1), 149-169. doi: 10.3167/ares.2011.020109

Rogers, Jennifer, & Zader, Amy. (2012). Food Security: From the Green Revolution to Nanotechnology. In R. Parker & R. Appelbaum (Eds.), Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development? (pp. 75-85). New York: Routledge.

Rogers-Brown, Jennifer, Shearer, Christine, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Martin, Tyronne. (2012). Different Uses, Different Responses: Exploring Emergent Cultural Values through Public Deliberation. In B. H. Harthorn & J. Mohr (Eds.), The Social Life of Nanotechnology (pp. 195-222). New York: Routledge.

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2006). Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2(3), 167-178.

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, Mohr, Alison, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2007). Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently? Nanoethics, Special Issue, 1(2), 123-176.

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, & Pidgeon, Nick (2008). Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs (June), 11.

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2008). Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: ‘upstream’ towards sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 1010-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.04.013

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, & Pidgeon, Nick. (2008). Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 345–364.

Saldivar, Laura, & Walsh, Casey. (2015). Nanotecnología para el tratamiento de agua. Claves sobre la investigación en México. Mundo Nano, 8(14), 53-69.

Satterfield, Terre, Kandlikar, Milind, Beaudrie, Christian, Conti, Joseph, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2009). Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies: Will They Be Like Other Controversial Nanotechnologies. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 752-758.

Satterfield, Terre, Conti, Joe, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Pidgeon, Nick, & Pitts, Anton. (2013). Understanding shifting perceptions of nanotechnologies and their implications for policy dialogues about emerging technologies. Science and Public Policy, 40(2), 247-260. doi: 10.1093/scippol/scs084

Scotchmer, Suzanne. (2011). Cap-and-Trade, Emissions Taxes, and Innovation. In J. Lerner & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy (Vol. 11), 29-53. Chicago: University of Chicago Press by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Shah, Sonali K., & Mody, Cyrus. (2014). Creating a Context for Entrepreneurship: Examining How Users' Technological and Organizational Innovations Set the Stage for Entrepreneurial Activity. In B. Frischmann, M. Madison & K. Strandburg (Eds.), Commons in the Cultural Environment (pp. 313-339). New York: Oxford University Press.

Shearer, Christine. (2012). Book Reviews: Kari Marie Norgaard's Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. Race, Gender, and Class, 19(1-2).

Shearer, Christine. (2012). From Kivalina A Climate change story. In S. Bannerjee (Ed.), Arctic Voices: Resistance at the Tipping Point (pp. 207-220). New York: Seven Stories Press.

Shearer, Christine. (2012). The Political Ecology of Adaptation Assistance: Alaska Natives, Displacement, and Relocation. The Journal of Political Ecology, 19, 174-183.

Shearer, Christine. (2012). The Social Construction of Alaska native Vulnerability to Climate Change. Race, Gender, and Class, 19(1-2), 61-79.

Shearer, Christine, Rogers-Brown, Jennifer, Bryant, Karl, Cranfill, Rachel, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2014). Power and Vulnerability: Re-contextualizing 'low risk' views of environmental and health hazards. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy. 21:235–257.

Simakova, Elena. (2012). Making nano matter: An inquiry into the discourses of governable science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 37(6), 604-626.

Slaton, Amy, Riley, Donna, & Cech, Erin. (forthcoming). Grit: Yearning, Personhood, and the Ontologies of American Engineering Education. In S. Fifield & W. Letts (Eds.), STEM of Desire. Dordrecht, NL: Sense Publishers.

Stocking, Galen. (2015). The Dynamics of Attention: Agenda Setting in the Modern Media Environment. (PhD), University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Political Science.  

Thomas, Merryn, Pidgeon, Nick, Evensen, Darrick, Partridge, Tristan, Hasell, Ariel, Enders, Catherine, & Harthorn, Barbara Herr. (2015). Public Perceptions of Shale Gas Operations in the USA and Canada: A Review of Evidence (online) M4ShaleGas: Measuring, monitoring, mitigating and managing the environmental impact of shale gas. Netherlands: TNO-Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research: The European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme.

Thomas, Merryn, Pidgeon, Nick, Whitmarsh, Lorraine, & Ballinger, Rhoda. (2015). Expert judgements of sea-level rise at the local scale. Journal of Risk Research, 1-22. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1043568

Thomas, Merryn, Pidgeon, Nick, Whitmarsh, Lorraine, & Ballinger, Rhoda. (2015). Mental models of sea-level change: A mixed methods analysis on the Severn Estuary, UK. Global Environmental Change, 33, 71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.009

Thomas, Merryn, Pidgeon, Nick, Partridge, Tristan, Evensen, Darrick, Hasell, Ariel, Enders, Catherine, Harthorn, Barbara Herr, & Bradshaw, Michael. (forthcoming). Public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas and oil in the United States and Canada. WIREs Climate Change.

Tyrrell, Brian. (2015). Book review of Carrie Friese, Cloning Wild Life: Zoos, Captivity, and the Future of Endangered Animals. Make Magazine. August 27.

Tyrrell, Brian. (2015). "Bred for the Race: Thoroughbred Breeding and Racial Science, 1900-1940". Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 45(4), 549-576.

Walsh, James, & Ridge, Claron. (2012). Knowledge Production and Nanotechnology: Characterizing American Dissertation Research, 1999-2009. Technology in Society, 34(2), 127-137.

Walsh, James. (2015). The impact of foreign-born scientists and engineers on American nanoscience research. Science and Public Policy, 42(1), 107-120. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct084

Weaver, David A., & Bimber, Bimber. (2008). Finding news stories: A comparison of searches using LexisNexis and Google News. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(3), 515-530.

Weaver, David A., Lively, Erica, & Bimber, Bruce. (2009). Searching for a Frame: Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation in the Case of Nanotechnology. Science Communication, 31(2), 139-166.

Xia, Tian, Malasarn, Davin, Lin, Sijie, Ji, Zhaoxia, Zhang, Haiyuan, Miller, Robert J., Harthorn, Barbara Herr, Godwin, Hilary A., Lenihan, Hunter S., Liu, Rong, Gardea-Torresdey, Jorge, Cohen, Yoram, Mädler, Lutz, Holden, Patricia A., Zink, Jeffrey I., & Nel, Andre E. (2012). Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Solve Complex Nano EHS problems by the UC Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Small. doi: 10.1002/smll.201201700

Youtie, Jan & Kay, Luciano. (2014). Acquiring Nanotechnology Capabilities: Role of Mergers and Acquisitions. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26(5) 547-563.

Záyago Lau, Edgar, & Foladori, Guillermo. (2012). La política de ciencia y tecnología en México y la incorporación de las nanotecnologías. In G. Foladori, E. Záyago & N. Invernizzi (Eds.), Perspectivas sobre el desarrollo de las nanotecnologías en América Latina (pp. 137-163). México D.F: Miguel Angel Porrua.

Záyago Lau, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, & Arteaga Figueroa, Edgar. (2012). Toward an Inventory of Nanotechnology Companies in Mexico. Nanotechnology Law & Business, 9(3).

Záyago Lau, Edgar. (2013). La nanotecnología y su inserción en el desarrollo. Observatorio del Desarrollo, 2(6), 37-43.

Záyago Lau, Edgar. (2013). The Social Relevance of Nanotechnology in Mexico. Sociologia y tecnociencia/Sociology and Technoscience 3(2): 48-70. 

Záyago Lau, Edgar. (2014). Nanotecnologías en América Latina, Asia-Pacífico y África. Observatorio del Desarrollo, 3(12), 41-46. http://estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/observatorio/ob12/11.pdf

Záyago Lau, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, Frederick, Stacey, & Arteaga Figueroa, Edgar. (2014). Researching Risks of Nanomaterials in Mexico. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 0(0), B4014001. doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000247

Záyago Lau, Edgar, Frederick, Stacey, & Foladori, Guillermo. (2014). Twelve years of nanoscience and nanotechnology publications in Mexico. Journal of Nanopartical Research, 16:2193-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-2193-1

Záyago Lau, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, Carrozza, T. J., Appelbaum, Richard, Villa, Liliana, & Robles Belmont, E. (2015). Empresas nanotecnológicas en Argentina. Realidad Económica (79), 34-54.

Záyago Lau, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, Frederick, Stacey, & Arteaga Figueroa, Ramon. (2015). ¿Se estudian los riesgos de los nanomateriales en México? Temas de Ciencia y Tecnología, 19(56), 17-27.

Záyago Lau, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, Frederick, Stacey, Arteaga Figueroa, Edgar, & García Guerrero, Miguel. (2015). Investigación sobre los riesgos de los nanomateriales en México. In G. Foladori, A. Hasmy, N. Invernizzi & E. Z. Lau (Eds.), Trabajo, riesgos y regulación de las nanotecnologías en América Latina (pp. 155-170). Mexico: D.F.: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.

Záyago Lau, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, Vazquez, Liliana Villa, Figueroa, Edgar, & Arteaga Figueroa, Ramon. (2015). Análisis Económico Sectorial de las Empresas de Nanotecnología en México. Documentos de Trabajo IELAT, 79, 1-25.

Záyago Lau, Edgar, Foladori, Guillermo, Carrozza, T. J., Appelbaum, Richard, Villa, Liliana, Parker, Rachel, & Robles Belmont, Eduardo. (forthcoming). Sectorial analysis of nanotechnology companies in Argentina. Nanotechnology Law & Business Journal.

Záyago Lau, Edgar. (forthcoming). Empresas nanotecnológicas en México: hacia un primer inventario.

Záyago Lau, Edgar. (forthcoming). La regulación de las nanotecnologías en México y la investigación sobre riesgos de los nanomateriales manufacturados. In G. Foladori, E. Záyago Lau, N. Invernizzi & M. Á. Porrúa (Eds.), Trabajo, riesgos y la regulación de las nanotecnologías en América Latina. Mexico.

Zúñiga, Homero, Copeland, Lauren, & Bimber, Bruce. (forthcoming). Political Consumerism: Civic Engagement and the Social Media Connection. New Media & Society.